Interesting Archives - Page 13 of 31 - I Hate Working In Retail

By

Report: Subway Has Had The Most Wage Violations Of All Fast Food Companies

(Mandy_Jansen)

(Mandy_Jansen)

While McDonald’s has been the name on many people’s lips when it comes to wage disputes and underpaid workers, a new report places Subway at the top of the pile of wage violation offenders. Though it’s worth nothing that with 26,000 U.S. locations, Subway has the most stores of all the companies, as well.

 

CNNMoney cites data collected by the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, which it says amounts to more than 1,100 investigations into individual Subway franchisees between 2000 and 2013, more than other companies like McDonald’s and Dunkin’ Donuts. Those came in second and third in the tallies of wage violations like pay and hour rules, respectively.

Those 1,100 cases found about 17,000 Fair Labor Standards Act violations combined, and amount to about $3.8 million paid out to Subway workers over that span of years.

Common incidents include employers making workers deduct 30 minutes for a lunch break even if the worker didn’t take a break, forcing workers to pay for a company uniform (which is a violation if the worker’s hourly rate falls below minimum wage after accounting for that expense),  or failing to pay workers for time spent doing things like the nightly closing routine.

One franchise also illegally deducted money from employees’ wages to cover cash register shortages, repeatedly. That location was ordered to pay $9,900 in back pay to 72 employees.

Although Subway would likely distance itself as a corporate parent from these franchisees, the problems were bad enough to spur a partnership with the Department of Labor last year to boost the company’s compliance efforts last year.

“It’s no coincidence that we approached Subway because we saw a significant number of violations,” a Department of Labor spokesperson said.

Meanwhile, McDonald’s and Dunkin’ Donuts both issued statements placing themselves far from their independently operated stores. Fast food companies are wont to do that, because while each location bears the corporate name and look and use the same business guidelines, they’re essentially small businesses in their own right.

That’s partly why it’s so tough to crack down on wage violations — the DOL has to investigate each location individually, which takes time, and can’t bring about sweeping changes to the whole company.

Subway didn’t comment for CNNMoney’s article, but McDonald’s and Dunkin’ Donuts did.

McDonald’s:

McDonald’s and our independent owner-operators share a concern and commitment to the well-being and fair treatment of all people who work in McDonald’s restaurants. Whether employed by McDonald’s or by our independent owner-operators, employees should be paid correctly. When McDonald’s learns of pay concerns in restaurants which we own and operate, we review the concerns and take appropriate action to resolve them. We trust that our independent owner-operators do the same. McDonald’s and our owner-operators employ separately but in total over 750,000 workers in the United States, and we caution against drawing broad conclusions based on the actions of a few.

Dunkin’ Donuts:

The Department of Labor report represents a very small percentage of cases per year involving the Dunkin’ Donuts system, given that there are more than 7,700 Dunkin’ Donuts restaurants independently owned and operated by our franchisees who employ approximately 120,000 crew members at any given time across the country. However, we and our franchisees, who are solely responsible for all employment decisions at their restaurants, take these matters seriously and are committed to the well-being and fair treatment of all crew members.

Sourced from cnnmoney.com

By

These 10 retailers had the worst customer satisfaction ratings for 2013

 

There’s no doubt the shopping experience has improved tremendously for Americans over the last decade. Online shopping has been the game-changer, but a lot of retailers have also focused on improving the in-store shopping “experience.”Still, nothing’s perfect.

Think of the stores you hate to have to visit. Yes, that grocery place with the long lines, or the department store with unhelpful sales representatives, or the fancy shop with overpriced items. You don’t like going there, but sometimes you have no choice.Now, what if you ranked all those retailers? The folks over at the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) conduct a survey every year asking people to rate their shopping experience based on factors including convenience of location, product quality, courtesy of staff and store layout.

It turns out that a lot of Americans hate (or love) shopping at the same stores.

Here are the 10 retailers with the worst customer satisfaction, based on ACSI’s latest rankings across different categories and compiled by business Web site 24x7WallStreet:

 

10. Winn-Dixie

This grocery and pharmacy chain is primarily based in the South. It scored 77 on the index for 2013, down from 2012.

 

9. Supervalu

This retail chain is the parent company of stores such as Farm Fresh and Shop ‘N’ Save, as well as discount store Save-A-Lot. Supervalu scored 77 on the index, an improvement from 2012.

 

8. Gap

The clothing retailer that was recently in the news for raising its employees’ minimum wage came in at No. 8. Gap scored 77 on the ACSI index, and it landed at the bottom of a smaller list of specialty retail stores.

 

7. Best Buy

The electronics giant, which posted better-than-expected earnings Thursday morning, scored 77 on the index, a decline from 2012.

 

6. Safeway

Grocery chain Safeway improved slightly from 2012, posting a score of 76. But in the supermarkets category, Safeway was rated the second-worst retailer.

 

5. Macy’s

Shoppers weren’t very satisfied with Macy’s in 2013, as the retailer’s score fell compared with 2012. That doesn’t seem to have affected its profits, though. Macy’s was one of the few retailers to post strong sales during the rough holiday season.

 

4. Walgreen’s

Pharmacy chain Walgreen’s plans to expand this year and is in the process of acquiring Kerr Drug’s. The company’s score was unchanged from a year ago, and it outranked rivals CVS and Rite Aid in the health and personal care category.

 

3. CVS

CVS’s recent decision to stop the sale of all tobacco products may not sit well with smokers, but other Americans aren’t thrilled with the store, either. CVS’s score did improve compared with 2012, though.

 

2. Rite Aid

Americans are largely dissatisfied with the speed of checkout at drug stores, according to the ACSI report, which is why so many made the list. Rite Aid’s score dropped from last year. The expansion of CVS stores and a simultaneous reduction in Rite Aid outlets may have contributed to the decline, the report said.

 

1. Wal-Mart

The world’s biggest retailer received the dubious honor of being ranked No. 1 on this list.   Wal-Mart’s score was unchanged from last year. The report said Wal-Mart has had low customer satisfaction rankings for at least a decade. Wal-Mart’s last earnings report wasn’t great, and the discount store isn’t very optimistic about 2014.

 

Retailers were ranked in separate categories, such as supermarkets or discount stores. The scores reflect the stores that performed worse than the average within their category.

It should be noted that overall customer satisfaction with retailers increased for the third year in a row. Surprisingly, the in-store retail experience was rated better than online shopping. As more people shopped online, stores were less crowded, the report said.

“A spate of last-minute holiday purchases online, combined with inclement weather, left some buyers disgruntled by delayed shipments,” said Claes Fornell, the ACSI’s chairman and founder. “That’s the likely reason for Internet retail getting its lowest customer satisfaction benchmark in more than a decade.”

Sourced from thewashingtonpost.com

By

The Future of Retail Checkout: No Checkout at All?

“People have said when checkout is working really well, it will feel like stealing. You grab a pair of shoes and you just walk out.” That’s how Michael Chui, a partner at the McKinsey Global Institute, describes the retail-checkout experience in your not-too-distant future.

This coming transformation in the way you pay for items in bricks-and-mortar stores will occur through a network of sensors placed strategically around stores, which will enable retailers to recognize you (through your smartphone or other devices) when you walk through the door. Inexpensive sensors also will be attached to (or embedded in) items available for purchase. And the stores will already have your preferred payment information on file, so when you exit the store with your chosen merchandise, you’ll simply be billed automatically, totally skipping any traditional checkout experience.

Many restaurants are already in the vanguard of transforming the checkout experience. As Alexis Madrigal explained two years ago here, a growing number of restaurants are using iPads or other tablets to have diners place their own orders and then check themselves out at the end of the meal. If such a change becomes widespread, as Madrigal pointed out, the implications for waitstaff employment will be profound.

Retail stores are heading in that direction too. According to M.V. Greene, writing in Stores, a trade magazine for retailers:

The “Internet of Things,” where objects in the physical world are connected to electronic virtual networks, is poised to turn retail on its head. Not since the introduction of online shopping – and before that credit and debit cards for purchasing – has something in retail had the potential to be so transformative.

Usually, when we think of “transformative” changes, we’re talking about things most people didn’t even anticipate coming at the time: examples include the radio, the atomic bomb, the Internet. But this coming change in our retail experience is, I would guess, something that many people wouldn’t find all that surprising. After all, the history of retail shopping is one of task-shifting.

More recently, efficiencies have built on that model of having the customer do more of the work, now augmented by technology. For example, a growing number of grocery chains have “intelligent” carts that can total up items as a customer moves through the store, tracking movement and making recommendations. And in many stores, especially grocery and drug-store chains, customers can use self-checkout kiosks. In Apple stores, for a couple of years already, you’ve been able to buy off-the-shelf items using an app on your smartphoneand walk out of the store with your merchandise, having never interacted with a salesperson.

But just because the coming changes in retail checkout aren’t beyond our imagining doesn’t mean that they’re unimportant. For one thing, they’re likely to have profound effects on retail employment. In fact, according to data from The Economist, retail workers are among those whose jobs are most likely to be displaced by digital or computer-related technologies in the next 20 years. (I should note that the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics holds a different view, projecting that growth in the number of retail-sales jobs is likely to hold steady—at about 10 percent—over the next decade. Your guess as to who is right may be better than mine, but I’m putting my money with the folks at The Economist.)

Apart from employment concerns, the vision of a digitally-automated retail future provokes unease about privacy issues. As M.V. Greene notes, “a major hurdle for brands and retailers is to gain the trust of consumers when their personal data is flying back and forth in real-time across networks.” Greene quotes David Dorf, a Senior Director of Technology Strategy at Oracle Retail, who says retailers have to be worried about a “creepiness factor” related to the privacy of consumer data.

Dorf advises merchants to avoid a “stalker” configuration as they deploy these new technologies and adopt a “butler” configuration instead. “The stalker wants something from you and typically is trying to get as much information as possible and wanting to directly impact you.” By contrast, “The butler is kind of always in the background, always helping you, pointing things out that might be of interest, trying to make your life easier.”

“If retailers can focus on this butler mentality,” Dorf predicts, “the Internet of Things has a lot of potential to make the customer experience more rich and engaging, and loyalty will ensue.”

It’s oddly reminiscent of another Internet-enabled butler, the early search engine Ask Jeeves. It could take a few years, but we may soon see how a Jeeves-like digital figure fares in the brick-and-mortar world.


To contact the author, write TierneyJT at gmail.

 

Sourced from theatlantic.com