Fashion Retail Archives - Page 10 of 16 - I Hate Working In Retail

By

Retail Job Growth Illusion: More Workers, Fewer Hours

The rank-and-file retail workforce has never been through an employment drought like the kind seen in the past two years, outside of a recession or its immediate aftermath.

While retail-industry woes are a regular news staple, the sector’s addition of 308,000 nonmanagerial jobs from December 2011 to December 2013 — before severe winter weather began skewing economic data — has provided the appearance of a recovery in payrolls. Yet that increase was offset by a slide in the average workweek to 30 hours from 30.7 hours.

In fact, total hours clocked by nonsupervisors didn’t budge in that two-year span, Bureau of Labor Statistics data show. (They later took a weather-related dive to start 2014.)

Income Inequality Debate

“When you go into stores these days, it’s increasingly difficult to find service,” said Ken Perkins, president of Retail Metrics.

Companies have been adopting self-checkout machines and scanners to check prices, while shifting more of their investment to their online operations, he pointed out.

This recent, unusual period of stagnation is important to consider because no sector employs more low-wage workers, so none may be more central to the debate over how to narrow inequality.

The retail industry encompasses 13.1 million nonsupervisory workers who earn, on average, just over $14 an hour. And the number making less than $10 an hour tops 5 million.

The key question is how retail-sector employment of low-wage workers, currently at a standstill, will hold up if employers are mandated to take on more responsibility for health care coverage and pay a substantially higher minimum wage.

Meanwhile, most retailers are already suffering from consumers still hobbled by an incomplete jobs recovery, aggressive price competition, and the ongoing shift to online sales.

And while Washington is debating an online sales tax to help brick-and-mortar retailers compete, ObamaCare and minimum-wage mandates could encourage low-labor online business models and make expansion plans somewhat riskier.

Brick-and-mortar retail is “a shrinking industry” that’s looking to cut costs, Perkins said. “For them to be able to generate additional revenue to cover the additional cost of health care and a higher minimum wage is going to be very difficult.”

Warning Sign?

The decline in the average workweek in 2013 came as anecdotes piled up about retailers cutting work schedules below ObamaCare’s full-time threshold of 30 hours per week and offers a possible warning sign that the industry won’t take on such mandates without a hitch.

In the long-troubled office supplies sector, Staples (SPLS) began enforcing a limit of 25 hours per week for part-timers in January, not long before it announced plans to close 225 stores.

Among general merchandise retailers (department stores and discounters) and clothing stores, their 3.7 million nonmanagerial workers are down a little more than 2% over the past two years, while the total number of hours they work has tumbled more than 9%.

Florida-based Bealls Department Stores and David’s Bridal are among retailers in these categories restructuring their workforces to limit the number of employees above the 30-hours-per-week threshold.

Even as nonmanagers have been losing jobs at clothing and general merchandise stores, the number of managers has been rising in both of these groups and in the retail industry as a whole — by nearly 100,000 in the past year. Yet those gains seemed to peter out in the past three months as store-closing announcements picked up.

RadioShack (RSH), J.C. Penney (JCP) and Children’s Place (PLCE) are among other retailers that have announced plans to close stores recently.

Many economists make the argument that better-paid employees can have positive effects on a firm’s bottom line due to better morale, higher productivity and lower turnover. A rise in the minimum wage also could support higher demand, though a need to raise prices could have the opposite effect.

The Congressional Budget Office’s recent analysis of the Democratic proposal to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour was widely reported to result in a loss of 500,000 jobs.

Yet that estimate didn’t account for the ObamaCare employer mandate. The nonpartisan scorekeeper said that combining a minimum-wage hike with ObamaCare’s employer penalties would likely cause deeper job losses than a wage hike alone.

ObamaCare’s extra cost “boosts the likelihood that employers’ savings from reducing the size of their workforces would exceed their adjustment costs” necessary to retool for those job cuts, such as installing labor-saving equipment, the budget agency said.

Yet it’s possible that the employer mandate wouldn’t magnify job losses due to a higher minimum wage, but rather intensify pressure on low-wage employers to keep work schedules below 30 hours.

Read More At Investor’s Business Daily: http://news.investors.com

 

Share the joy
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

By

EA’s Worst Company In America Reign Comes To An End With Loss To Time Warner Cable

wcia2014header

Video game giant Electronic Arts stepped into the Worst Company In America nonagon of unpleasantness this morning crowned with two Golden Poos and with the confidence that the tournament’s only two-time winner deserves. But in the end, it wasn’t EA that was carried out of the arena in victory — it was Time Warner Cable.

In the narrowest margin of victory since 2011, when BP beat Bank of America for the WCIA by less than one percent, Time Warner Cable upset EA’s attempt at a three-peat by eking out 51.2% of the vote.

Despite its cock-up of the Battlefield 4 and Titanfall releases, EA just didn’t have the all-out support that it had received in the previous two tournaments. And while Time Warner Cable has always merited a spot in the WCIA brackets, the company’s pending merger with former WCIA champ Comcast undoubtedly played into readers’ voting decisions. Judging by the absolute crushing that Comcast brought down on Yahoo in its first round match, there is a lot of hatred out there for the nation’s largest cable/Internet provider, and today’s TWC result confirms that voters are more than happy to spread that hate around.

In theory, there could be a final Death Match showdown between merger partners TWC and Comcast, but there are some big speedbumps in the way. Before we can even start planning that contest, TWC will need to defeat Koch Industries in Round Two.

americanlululemonAMERICAN AIRLINES VS. LULULEMON
It probably not a surprise that the nation’s newly merged, now-largest airline beat out a yoga apparel company with pants that were so see-through that the CEO, and thecompany co-founder, and others had to step down. In fact, WCIA newcomer Lululemon should not be in downward-facing-dog after its loss, as it managed to earn nearly 1/3 of the vote against a much bigger company in an industry people love to hate.

The next round will be a true test of American’s WCIA worth, in a red-white-and-black-and-blue battle with Bank of America.

ticketmasteraetnaTICKETMASTER/LIVE NATION VS. AETNA
Even though we hear lots of hate for health insurance companies and one or two always makes the bracket, they never seem to go very far. The latest healthcare hopeful to go all Glass Joe in the WCIA ring is Aetna, which didn’t really stand a chance against perennial Final Four contender Ticketmaster/Live Nation. After all, not everyone has Aetna, but if you want to see a concert or sporting event, there’s a good chance you’ll be paying the Ticketmaster piper his fee.

Looking ahead to Round Two, Ticketmaster will face off against either newcomer SeaWorld or the acetaminophen-pushers of Johnson & Johnson/McNeil.

For those keeping track at home, with four matches left to go in Round One, here’s how the bracket looks right now:
2014wciabracketdayfour

 

Source theconsumerist.com

Share the joy
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

By

This J.C. Penney Worker Was Fired For Telling The Truth About Its ‘Fake’ Prices

JCPENNEY BOB BLATCHFORD

J.C. Penney is going to war against a former employee who outed the department store for its questionable discounting practices.

The department store was drastically hiking prices on items, cutting them back and then advertising huge “discounts,” the former employee, Bob Blatchford, told the Today show last July. In one case, a “rack of $7 shorts became $14, and then they were 50 percent off,” a separate J.C. Penney worker told the Today show.

“I saw a lot of pricing teams going through the store, raising the prices, mostly doubling — towels and clothing,” Blatchford told NBC’s Jeff Rossen. “Then they would go on sale, and they wouldn’t always go on sale for 50 percent off. Not only was it a fake sale, but they were actually paying more than they would have been previously.”

Ominously, Blatchford told Today, “I don’t think Penney’s will survive if they keep doing this.”

Now it’s Blatchford who is fighting for survival. Two days after his appearance on the Today show, he was fired from J.C. Penney in St. Petersburg, Fla., where he was a custom decorating studio coordinator. When he filed for unemployment benefits, J.C. Penney contested his claim, he said. J.C. Penney also recently filed an arbitration petition to get Blatchford to give back any company documents that he might have. But Blatchford thinks the arbitration is really just an attempt to discourage him from speaking out about the company.

J.C. Penney declined to comment on Blatchford’s situation or its pricing strategy.

The fight between Blatchford and J.C. Penney belies an open retail secret: Discounts, sale prices and big promotions are largely a game of smoke and mirrors. But until J.C. Penney ousted its CEO last year and his predecessor reinstated old pricing strategies, it was a largely unconfirmed open secret.

Retailers use the sly tactic to manipulate customers’ minds, said Mark Elwood, author of Bargain Fever: How To Shop In A Discounted World. Once customers are taught to crave discounts, it becomes addictive, and they keep coming back for more. “We are chemically programmed to respond to sales,” Elwood said.
Shoppers go through racks of clothing on sale at the J.C. Penney Co. store inside the Glendale Galleria shopping center in Glendale, Calif., U.S., on Friday, Aug. 16, 2013. Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg via Getty Images

J.C. Penney’s trouble with sale pricing started with CEO Ron Johnson, who in 2012 pledged to eliminate “fake prices” — inflated prices used throughout the retail industry to convince customers they’re getting a great deal. Johnson eradicated coupons, sales and discounts at the 112-year-old retailer.

Coupon-crazed shoppers revolted, with devastating consequences for J.C. Penney. Sales plummeted by an astonishing $4.3 billion in the first year of Johnson’s turnaround plan. “Coupons were a drug,” the CEO admitted on a 2012 conference call with investors and analysts. “They really drove traffic.”

Johnson was fired in the spring of 2013. But even before his ouster, J.C. Penney began jacking up its “everyday prices,” then discounting them to create the perception that customers were nabbing a deal, according to a report from Reuters.

When Mike Ullman retook the reins as CEO in April 2013, mass sales and coupons returned to the department store in a forceful attempt to regain the bargain-hunters.

That’s when the scrutiny began. Consumer groups investigated the discounts, releasing numerous examples of sale prices that were actually higher than the original price tags. Local news stations probed stores through hidden-camera investigations. Time declared J.C. Penney’s prices “faker than ever.”

J.C. Penney insiders told HuffPost that customers have responded well to the price changes since their implementation. A regional executive, who spoke on condition he not be named for fear of retaliation by his employer, said customers don’t understand that they’re often “overpaying” for much of the merchandise, even though sales make prices appear cheaper than before. “Guess that’s retail,” he mused.

Take J.C. Penney’s “Michael Graves Design Bells and Whistles Stainless Steel Tea Kettle,” for instance. Originally priced at an even $40 under the previous CEO’s no-sales strategy, J.C. Penney suddenly bumped the kettle up to $58 after discounts were reintroduced — a 45 percent price hike. But J.C. Penney made sure to offer a sale, bringing the price back down to $39.99. It appeared that customers would save $18 by making the purchase.


J.C. Penney’s Michael Graves kettle priced at $40 before the strategy shift in 2013, compared with the $58 price (on sale for $39.99) after the change.

J.C. Penney and department store competitor Kohl’s were each slapped with class-action lawsuits in 2013, claiming their sales tactics violated consumer protection guidelines in the state of California, which has specific rules to protect consumers from misleading deals.

The federal guidelines against deceptive sale prices are more vague. According to the Federal Trade Commission: If the original price being advertised has been “offered to the public on a regular basis for a reasonably substantial period of time,” then there is a basis for legitimacy. But if an artificially inflated price was created in order to promote a sale, that’s considered a false bargain — and could potentially be taken to court.

Marking up prices only to mark them back down as a promotion is a fairly universal practice, according to Robin Lewis, co-author of The New Rules of Retail and CEO of retail industry newsletter The Robin Report. But lately, retailers have become more aggressive due to intense competition.

“The sales seem to be getting deeper,” said Lewis. “They’re figuring out all kinds of different ways of discounting. Retailers have to fight tooth and nail for a share of the market. The growth is coming from stealing the customer away from a competitor, so the weapon of choice becomes price.”

Lewis stressed that current CEO Ullman — who also held the reins at J.C. Penney before Johnson’s tenure — had no choice but to return to the old ways of discounting, since the idea has been used for decades to great effect: “Ullman had to get the business righted. He had to stabilize it, and he had to do everything in his power to get the customers back. He had to go back to the tried-and-true pricing process,” he said. J.C. Penney suffered a whopping $985 million loss in 2013, bringing the retailer to the brink.

Compounding Ullman’s problems is a widespread loss of customer trust. For years, J.C. Penney customers perused the aisles for the best deals and discounts. Suddenly, that experience disappeared, and the betrayed shoppers left. “They threw their hands up, shut their wallets and walked out the front door,” said Lewis.


In this Oct. 23, 2009 photo, Mike Ullman, Chairman and CEO of J.C. Penney Company, Inc., visits a company store in New York. Mike Ullman was named CEO of J.C. Penney after Ron Johnson was ousted on April 8, 2013, after restructuring backfired. Photographer: Mark Lennihan/The Associated Press

Outspoken employees like Blatchford are interfering with J.C. Penney’s path to repentance. Eight months after his firing, J.C. Penney filed a petition against Blatchford with the American Arbitration Association. In it, J.C. Penney characterized Blatchford’s revelations on NBC that the company drastically hiked prices and then slashed them in order to tout a “sale” as “trade secret, proprietary and confidential business information.”

J.C. Penney accused Blatchford of having an “unbalanced vendetta” against his former employer and a “love of media attention.” The company claims that it was forced to bring the matter to arbitration in order to protect customers, and says Blatchford holds confidential business and customer records.

The struggling retailer must tamp down on the constant condemnation of its pricing tactics if it wants to reclaim the droves of customers it lost, according to Dorothy Crenshaw, CEO and creative director at public relations firm Crenshaw Communications. J.C. Penney knows this, she added.

“I’m sure they don’t want people to be talking about it,” Crenshaw said. “It is very likely how many stores operate, but this is much more of a drumbeat around a particular store, at a time that they least need it. They’d love for this whole thing to go away.”

Sourced from thehuffingtonpost.com

Share the joy
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •