Grocery Retail Archives - Page 47 of 72 - I Hate Working In Retail

By

This J.C. Penney Worker Was Fired For Telling The Truth About Its ‘Fake’ Prices

JCPENNEY BOB BLATCHFORD

J.C. Penney is going to war against a former employee who outed the department store for its questionable discounting practices.

The department store was drastically hiking prices on items, cutting them back and then advertising huge “discounts,” the former employee, Bob Blatchford, told the Today show last July. In one case, a “rack of $7 shorts became $14, and then they were 50 percent off,” a separate J.C. Penney worker told the Today show.

“I saw a lot of pricing teams going through the store, raising the prices, mostly doubling — towels and clothing,” Blatchford told NBC’s Jeff Rossen. “Then they would go on sale, and they wouldn’t always go on sale for 50 percent off. Not only was it a fake sale, but they were actually paying more than they would have been previously.”

Ominously, Blatchford told Today, “I don’t think Penney’s will survive if they keep doing this.”

Now it’s Blatchford who is fighting for survival. Two days after his appearance on the Today show, he was fired from J.C. Penney in St. Petersburg, Fla., where he was a custom decorating studio coordinator. When he filed for unemployment benefits, J.C. Penney contested his claim, he said. J.C. Penney also recently filed an arbitration petition to get Blatchford to give back any company documents that he might have. But Blatchford thinks the arbitration is really just an attempt to discourage him from speaking out about the company.

J.C. Penney declined to comment on Blatchford’s situation or its pricing strategy.

The fight between Blatchford and J.C. Penney belies an open retail secret: Discounts, sale prices and big promotions are largely a game of smoke and mirrors. But until J.C. Penney ousted its CEO last year and his predecessor reinstated old pricing strategies, it was a largely unconfirmed open secret.

Retailers use the sly tactic to manipulate customers’ minds, said Mark Elwood, author of Bargain Fever: How To Shop In A Discounted World. Once customers are taught to crave discounts, it becomes addictive, and they keep coming back for more. “We are chemically programmed to respond to sales,” Elwood said.
Shoppers go through racks of clothing on sale at the J.C. Penney Co. store inside the Glendale Galleria shopping center in Glendale, Calif., U.S., on Friday, Aug. 16, 2013. Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg via Getty Images

J.C. Penney’s trouble with sale pricing started with CEO Ron Johnson, who in 2012 pledged to eliminate “fake prices” — inflated prices used throughout the retail industry to convince customers they’re getting a great deal. Johnson eradicated coupons, sales and discounts at the 112-year-old retailer.

Coupon-crazed shoppers revolted, with devastating consequences for J.C. Penney. Sales plummeted by an astonishing $4.3 billion in the first year of Johnson’s turnaround plan. “Coupons were a drug,” the CEO admitted on a 2012 conference call with investors and analysts. “They really drove traffic.”

Johnson was fired in the spring of 2013. But even before his ouster, J.C. Penney began jacking up its “everyday prices,” then discounting them to create the perception that customers were nabbing a deal, according to a report from Reuters.

When Mike Ullman retook the reins as CEO in April 2013, mass sales and coupons returned to the department store in a forceful attempt to regain the bargain-hunters.

That’s when the scrutiny began. Consumer groups investigated the discounts, releasing numerous examples of sale prices that were actually higher than the original price tags. Local news stations probed stores through hidden-camera investigations. Time declared J.C. Penney’s prices “faker than ever.”

J.C. Penney insiders told HuffPost that customers have responded well to the price changes since their implementation. A regional executive, who spoke on condition he not be named for fear of retaliation by his employer, said customers don’t understand that they’re often “overpaying” for much of the merchandise, even though sales make prices appear cheaper than before. “Guess that’s retail,” he mused.

Take J.C. Penney’s “Michael Graves Design Bells and Whistles Stainless Steel Tea Kettle,” for instance. Originally priced at an even $40 under the previous CEO’s no-sales strategy, J.C. Penney suddenly bumped the kettle up to $58 after discounts were reintroduced — a 45 percent price hike. But J.C. Penney made sure to offer a sale, bringing the price back down to $39.99. It appeared that customers would save $18 by making the purchase.


J.C. Penney’s Michael Graves kettle priced at $40 before the strategy shift in 2013, compared with the $58 price (on sale for $39.99) after the change.

J.C. Penney and department store competitor Kohl’s were each slapped with class-action lawsuits in 2013, claiming their sales tactics violated consumer protection guidelines in the state of California, which has specific rules to protect consumers from misleading deals.

The federal guidelines against deceptive sale prices are more vague. According to the Federal Trade Commission: If the original price being advertised has been “offered to the public on a regular basis for a reasonably substantial period of time,” then there is a basis for legitimacy. But if an artificially inflated price was created in order to promote a sale, that’s considered a false bargain — and could potentially be taken to court.

Marking up prices only to mark them back down as a promotion is a fairly universal practice, according to Robin Lewis, co-author of The New Rules of Retail and CEO of retail industry newsletter The Robin Report. But lately, retailers have become more aggressive due to intense competition.

“The sales seem to be getting deeper,” said Lewis. “They’re figuring out all kinds of different ways of discounting. Retailers have to fight tooth and nail for a share of the market. The growth is coming from stealing the customer away from a competitor, so the weapon of choice becomes price.”

Lewis stressed that current CEO Ullman — who also held the reins at J.C. Penney before Johnson’s tenure — had no choice but to return to the old ways of discounting, since the idea has been used for decades to great effect: “Ullman had to get the business righted. He had to stabilize it, and he had to do everything in his power to get the customers back. He had to go back to the tried-and-true pricing process,” he said. J.C. Penney suffered a whopping $985 million loss in 2013, bringing the retailer to the brink.

Compounding Ullman’s problems is a widespread loss of customer trust. For years, J.C. Penney customers perused the aisles for the best deals and discounts. Suddenly, that experience disappeared, and the betrayed shoppers left. “They threw their hands up, shut their wallets and walked out the front door,” said Lewis.


In this Oct. 23, 2009 photo, Mike Ullman, Chairman and CEO of J.C. Penney Company, Inc., visits a company store in New York. Mike Ullman was named CEO of J.C. Penney after Ron Johnson was ousted on April 8, 2013, after restructuring backfired. Photographer: Mark Lennihan/The Associated Press

Outspoken employees like Blatchford are interfering with J.C. Penney’s path to repentance. Eight months after his firing, J.C. Penney filed a petition against Blatchford with the American Arbitration Association. In it, J.C. Penney characterized Blatchford’s revelations on NBC that the company drastically hiked prices and then slashed them in order to tout a “sale” as “trade secret, proprietary and confidential business information.”

J.C. Penney accused Blatchford of having an “unbalanced vendetta” against his former employer and a “love of media attention.” The company claims that it was forced to bring the matter to arbitration in order to protect customers, and says Blatchford holds confidential business and customer records.

The struggling retailer must tamp down on the constant condemnation of its pricing tactics if it wants to reclaim the droves of customers it lost, according to Dorothy Crenshaw, CEO and creative director at public relations firm Crenshaw Communications. J.C. Penney knows this, she added.

“I’m sure they don’t want people to be talking about it,” Crenshaw said. “It is very likely how many stores operate, but this is much more of a drumbeat around a particular store, at a time that they least need it. They’d love for this whole thing to go away.”

Sourced from thehuffingtonpost.com

Share the joy
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

By

A day in the life of a retail manager.

tomfishburne.com

Share the joy
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

By

Which 9 US Retailers will be closing The Most Stores

1. Abercrombie & Fitch

Abercrombie & Fitch first announced its plans to close 180 stores by 2015 more than two years ago. In its most recent quarterly report, the company said it had closed 10 stores by November of last year and would close another 40 stores by the end of its fiscal year. This total does not include the 20 stand-alone Gilly Hicks brand stores, which the company also plans to shutter this year. Abercrombie & Fitch’s stock has struggled, posting one of the largest declines in the S&P 500 during 2013. To improve performance, the retailer is planning to shift marketing for its Abercrombie & Fitch to older shoppers while transforming its Hollister stores to a fast-fashion approach in line with H&M and Zara. A succession plan for CEO Mike Jeffries is also in the works. Last year, shareholders from Engaged Capital publicly campaigned for Jefferies’ dismissal, citing the retailer’s failure to adapt to fast-fashion, and Jeffries’ statements about excluding customers that he thought were too heavy for the brand.

2. Barnes & Noble

Early last year, Barnes & Noble announced plans to shut a third of its stores over the next 10 years. As of this January, the company had already closed some 14 retail locations, dropping its store count to 663 from the 677 it had when the announcement was first made. Particularly painful for many book-lovers, the retailer chose to close its one-time flagship store in New York City this January. While cost-cutting has helped the company post profits, by some measures the company’s prognosis remains bleak. Book retail has increasingly shifted to online and e-books, dominated by Amazon.com. But while Amazon.com has noted strong sales of its Kindle e-reader, Barnes & Noble’s own e-reader, the Nook, has struggled. Revenue of the bookstore’s Nook division, which include hardware and digital sales, fell by more than 50% year-over-year, and the segment remains unprofitable.

3. Aeropostale

Aeropostale is the in the midst of closing 40 to 50 stores in 2014, and plans to shutter some 175 stores in total over the next few years. The teen clothing retailer’s net income dropped to $34.92 million in 2013 from $229.5 million in 2010, and its EBITDA fell to $157.89 million last year from $435.45 million in 2010. Pressure from competitors such as Gap and Abercrombie & Fitch, as well as declining mall sales, has driven the company’s share price from $32.08 in 2010 to $7 as of March 2014. Private equity firm Hirzel acquired 6% of Aeropostale in November 2013. Currently, the company is rumored to be in talks with Barclays Plc. because it is seeking either additional financing or to be acquired. Aeropostale’s fast-fashion shipment model, which it took up last year, has largely been unsuccessful.

4. J.C. Penney

After J.C. Penney’s sales began to steadily decline, the company tasked Ron Johnson, formerly retail head at Apple, with reinventing the retailer’s pricing strategy, only to see sales, earnings, and cash flow fall off a cliff. After years of avoiding closing stores, the company has recently said it would be shuttering several locations. At the start of 2014, J.C. Penney announced 33 store closings, to be completed by May, leading to the loss of about 2,000 jobs. Some investors and pundits believe the company has not been aggressive enough in cutting stores. As of November, the company had 1,095 department stores, down only slightly from past years. Not all news has been bad for the retailer, which reported surprisingly strong earnings in February. Additionally, Standard & Poor’s recently upgraded the retailer’s credit outlook, although it noted changes will still be necessary to improve its credit long-term.

5. Office Depot

Office Depot merged with rival OfficeMax in November. Since the merger, the company has been cutting jobs at its combined headquarters. The next stage in integrating the two retailers, the company has stated, will be to cut store count. CEO Roland Smith admitted the company’s merger was difficult for many workers, telling the Orlando Sun-Sentinel that “it is difficult to focus on business when your personal future is uncertain.” The company had 1,912 retail stores at the end of its latest fiscal year, including 823 OfficeMax stores. Since the merger, the company has closed 15 of its Office Depot stores and seven OfficeMax locations.

6. RadioShack

During the Super Bowl, RadioShack attempted to poke fun at itself, running an ad touting its store remodelling that playfully referenced the store’s reputation as a throwback to the 1980s. But a reinvention alone may not save the electronics retailer — its previous attempt at rebranding itself as “The Shack” never caught on. The retailer recently announced it would close 1,100 out of its more-than 5,000 stores. The company has deemed these closings as critical to its cash-management and turnaround plans, which it hopes would help reverse recent poor results. Both the company’s top and bottom lines have declined considerably in recent years, and its operating cash flow is also down from years past. The fourth quarter of last year, which coincides with the holiday season, was especially troubling. Sales declined 19% at stores open at least a year because of lower foot traffic and weak performance in mobile sales.

7. Sears Holdings

Sears has been heading downhill since 2005, when Wall Street billionaire Edward Lampert merged Sears Roebuck & Co. with Kmart in a deal worth $11 billion. Since 2010, the company has closed roughly 300 stores. One of the few surges in the company’s share price came at the end of January, after it announced the closing of its flagship store in Chicago in April. Shedding its assets has been a major part of the company’s business for years. The company has not only dumped stores, but entire businesses, including Orchard Supplies Hardware Stores, Sears Hometown & Outlet Stores, Lands End, and a part of its stake in Sears Canada. Cowen analyst John Kernan recently noted that he expected Sears Holdings to close an additional 500 stores going-forward.

8. Staples

Staples recently announced plans to close 225 stores, or roughly 12% of its total count, by the end of 2015. The closures reflect both the company’s struggling sales totals, as well as its shift away from brick-and-mortar business to online retail. In its recent earnings release, the company said almost half of its sales come from online orders, and store closures reflect an opportunity to save money while improving the company’s bottom line. This is not the first time headwinds have lead the company to close stores. In 2012, Staples shut 60 stores, mostly in Europe, as part of its plans to cut costs. The company referred to its shift to online sales.

9. Toys “R” Us

A Toys “R” Us was taken private by a consortium of companies in 2005. Nearly a decade later, disagreements among the company’s ownership and a high debt burden have weighed down the retailer. In all, Toys “R” Us spent nearly three years trying to time an IPO, before backtracking last May. In early March of this year, industry sources told The Record’s NorthJersey.com that the company would soon close some 100 stores. Whether or not the company decides to close stores, major changes may be needed. Real estate giant Vornado, one of the three co-owners of Toys “R” Us, recently announced a more than $240 million writedown on its investment in the company. Among the reasons it gave were the company’s 2013 holiday sales results, “and our inability to forecast a recovery in the near term.” Toys “R” Us has struggled to keep up with online competition as well. A December report from Bloomberg indicated it was easier to find the holidays’ hottest toys on Amazon.com than through Toys “R” Us’ website.

Correction: An earlier version of this article stated that Barnes & Noble had closed 26 since it announced plans to close 200 stores over ten years. In fact, it closed 14 stores since the announcement.

Source 247 wallst.com

Share the joy
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •